tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8810896497806344693.post1728907112496378767..comments2023-12-30T09:16:37.781-04:00Comments on Not Worthy of the Name: Our Anglican Heritage: (6) The Second Prayer Book (1552)notworthyofthenamehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03966552851997811415noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8810896497806344693.post-59345286110658079432007-11-13T14:58:00.000-04:002007-11-13T14:58:00.000-04:00Thanks! I am grateful for the clarification.Thanks! I am grateful for the clarification.notworthyofthenamehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03966552851997811415noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8810896497806344693.post-91473116718028634522007-11-13T05:11:00.000-04:002007-11-13T05:11:00.000-04:00pjfqjjThe offertory had already been abolished in ...pjfqjjThe offertory had already been abolished in the 1549 Book. The first part which had been during the Gradual in the Sarum Rite was abolished by the word "immediately" in the 1549 rubric after the Epistle. The verses which had accompanied the traditional Offertory were abolished in 1549 and replaced by ones about giving money. The men and women separately processed from the nave to the chancel to receive communion, like a Christmas game said the Cornish rebels (thinking of Sir Roger), on their way passing the poor box. Only then without ceremony was the bread and wine put on the table. All this is in the rubrics of the 1549 book. The 1552 book merely made clear, as the Act enforcing it said ,what was already in the 1549 one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com